School board puts bond issue into motion

By Tracy Buffington/Executive Editor
Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 - 10:59:37 am CDT

Pieces are beginning to come together for Fremont Public Schools to bring a “no levy increase” bond proposal up to a vote.

On Monday, the board of education gave formal approval to have the administration move forward with a possible referendum on the issue in April 2009.

If a referendum were to be held, voters would be asked to maintain the current 21 cents per $100 assessed valuation levy to pay for bonds to complete several building projects throughout the district.

Those projects include:

n A 15,000-square-foot addition to Linden Elementary School and the demolition of the old two-story building. The school’s boiler also would be replaced.

n A 7,500-square-foot addition to Clarmar Elementary School along with remodeling for student services and an upgraded media library. The school’s boiler also would be replaced.

n Improve the front entry areas and address security issues at Clarmar, Grant, Howard and Washington elementary schools.

n A new fifth- and sixth-grade building to accommodate 700 to 800 students. The current middle school would then house only seventh and eighth grades.

n A 23,000-square-foot classroom and commons addition along with remodeling the family and consumer science classroom lab.

Additionally, the district would consider reorganizing the elementary schools into kindergarten through fourth-grade centers that would have room available for expansion.

The estimated cost for all of the projects is $22 million to $24 million.

Administrators have said the proposed projects would allow the district to handle 800 additional students. The district has more than 4,600 students now and enrollment has grown in the past few years.

Enrollment figures for the 2008-09 school year won’t be available until the September school board meeting.

Throughout the late spring and summer, the district has worked to hire an architectural firm, a construction manager and a fiscal agent for the project.

On Monday, the board agreed to hire D.A. Davidson and Co. as its

fiscal agent to sell bonds if they are approved by voters. The company has done work with the district in the past, including refinancing the current bonds that saved the district about $750,000.

The firm was chosen over Ameritus.

Both presented proposals to the school board on Monday night.

Board members discussed both proposals and found them to be similar, including the fee each firm would charge to handle the bond transaction. End the end, it came down to working with a group they were familiar with.

That was similar to the approach used in hiring an architectural firm and construction manager. The top candidates for each of those positions had similar qualifications and proposals.

In the end, the board chose to work with BVH Architects of Omaha for architectural services and RL Fauss Builders Inc. of Fremont for construction management.

All three of the firms will help in pre-election activities, including assisting in developing items for community meetings. And all three have agreed to waive fees if the bond referendum is not successful.

In other business, the board:

n Heard about the maintenance work that was performed during the summer. That included painting 40 classrooms, installing water coolers at Milliken Park Elementary School, assisting with the installation of playground equipment and other playground improvements at Platteville Elementary, renovating the gym floor at Howard Elementary, replacing tile in some classrooms at Linden Elementary and Davenport Early Learning Center and remodeling the art room at Grant Elementary.

At the high school, the parking lot was resurfaced, logos were repainted on the gym floor, the gym’s scoreboard was replaced and the practice field turf was renovated.

Additional, custodial staff cleaned and waxed the approximately 1 million square feet of floors throughout the district in preparation of the upcoming school year.

n Approved the donation of $4,500 from the Howard Elementary PTA for guided reading materials, maps, globes and physical education circuit center materials.

n Tabled discussion on the first reading of a revised administrator/teacher early separation program to allow negotiations with the Fremont Education Association.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Email Address Required
   
Also..........
Aug 19, 2008 11:16 AM
It's nice they resurfaced the high school parking lot, but the entry/exit roads on 16th & Lincoln really need to be widened; can't believe that wasn't done. It's fine for small cars, but not all the SUV's, buses, etc.
scoop I
Aug 19, 2008 11:22 AM
And tell me again why we closed 3 grade schools and now need more schools??
Reality
Aug 19, 2008 1:00 PM
FYI, real estate taxes (school taxes) are going to be going up anyway, which aren't connected to the bond issue---but the reason we need this bond issue is connected to the illegal immigration issue that we are facing. Voting NO on this issue will send a definite, firm message to the city that Fremonters do NOT want to keep paying in regard to the illegal immigration issues.......no matter how they dress it up and masquerade it; promising taxes won't go up........
Dearest Scoop I
Aug 19, 2008 1:01 PM
The answer to your question is because the main purpose of the government-run public schools is to raise taxes every chance they get.
civil engineer
Aug 19, 2008 1:12 PM
Unless they plan on putting a traffic light on Johnson Road and Military (or a roundabout) plus relocating 1st Street North of the tracks BEFORE any bond is issued VOTE NO!

Get an engineer out there (without ties to Fremont) and they will say the same. Another plan without a master plan.

Do it right!
A Real Taxpayer
Aug 19, 2008 1:22 PM
"If a referendum were to be held, voters would be asked to maintain the current 21 cents per $100 assessed valuation levy to pay for bonds to complete several building projects throughout the district" --- No levy increase!!!
Wait a minute. Sounds like the persson who pays the minimum on his credit cards and then refinances. What a sham!
It is called increased debt!!!!!!
Wake up Fremont
Food thought
Aug 19, 2008 1:38 PM
Several years ago we approved a bond issued for the JR High. A lot of people thought it would be built in a central location(where Bell Field is now located), instead they built it on the extreme east side of Fremont. The school board either did not think about, or care about the kids walking and riding their bikes to school. When they built the new JR High why did they not realize they were going to need more space. Do not give the school board more of your money until they are replaced with people who will wisely manage the resources they are given.
Mom of FPS kids
Aug 19, 2008 2:16 PM
I personally like that our school board is being somewhat proactive about the future of the school system here in Fremont. Our family is not originally from here but were here to vote on the last school bond. I have to say that Fremont has an excellent school system. I have never been to a place that has had such wonderful school facilities. I understand that their maybe some aspects of the new and existing schools that are not what everyone would like for example the distance the Middle School is to the town's general population. As a parent of two elementary school students I don't want the kids of this town to suffer through larger classroom sizes and the eventual becoming run down if the people of Fremont stop supporting their school board. I know that their are things that could have been done better but that's where we come in as citizens. If it's not what you want vote for someone else for school board when the elections come around, or better yet run for school board yourself. It's to easy for people to be mad at what the board does or doesn't do, but the only ones who pay for those actions are not the school board members, but the teachers and students of the district. I'm not saying that I am for or against the tax levy staying the same, as I think more information needs to be relayed on the proposed projects - but keep an open mind as to who you are upset with and how you can best right any wrongs.
M
Aug 19, 2008 2:48 PM
Are you serious?? JUST SAY NO! what a joke the "governing" body in this little town is-they have no foresight at all-ever. I do NOT want to pay for illegals to send their illegal offspring to school here-go back home!! For those of you who want the new school bills, please donate your entire salary each year to the cause and leave mine alone. no doubt they will have a special election to shove this down our throats like the other stupid ideas they cook up. We are still saddled with the current pool and school bond-now this-I vote no!!
George G
Aug 19, 2008 4:05 PM
Why is it so hard for folks on this blog to actually read stories before commenting or getting facts straight before they sound off with such force? I don't really care if you vote yes or no -- but make a choice based on the facts. This is the start of the process -- not the end. There will be meetings I assume and a chance to get all the info...there isn't enough here to determine a yer or no vote -- if you really care to do the work to make an informed decision.

And, for those folks blaming the schools for the bad intersection at Military -- talk to your city council -- they control the roads -- not the school board.

And, finally, the school distrcit is much bigger than the city of Fremont so whatever mistakes Fremont wants to make about immigration will only have a very limited impact on the need for schools.

I sure hope none of you that are so worried about the costs of this are the same ones willing to throw away so much but creating an illegal law to try and ban the "illegals" --
Clarmar Parent
Aug 19, 2008 4:07 PM
Clarmar is is deperate need of this additional space and improvements -- we did not get much besides the air condidtioning in the past -- it is needed and from what I've heard so far the plan makes sense.
Alex L
Aug 19, 2008 4:11 PM
I realize that folks around here like to wait until things are in horrible shape and an emergency before we spend a dime...but this plan actually has a plan. And as I recall from the last bond issue - this is exactly what they told us we would need to do.

The districts all around us Omaha, Bennington, Columbus, DC West, etc seem to be able to plan for the future -- why not here?
A Real Taxpayer Is Correct
Aug 19, 2008 4:41 PM
You're correct. We'll have the usual brainwashing - every community group, church group, every RETIREMENT home, etc. etc. etc. will receive a speech by the committee pushng the bond issue. FPS is raising school taxes on your real estate taxes anyway to cover increased utilities, increased transportation costs, supplies, the increase in salary that employees received, and the list goes on and on. I have 2 children 3 years apart, so I had to drive out to the middle school & back every day for way too many years; it was a nightmare. I don't care to do it again for 5th grade; no thanks.
Concerned Fremonter
Aug 19, 2008 5:27 PM
TO: Scoop, Reality, Civil Engineer, Real Taxpayer, Food Thought and M - I totally agree and couldn't have said it better.

My only additional comment would be this... The "new" Middle School was designed into 3 pods; one for each grade because we were told it was needed for our kids to learn better. With the new plan, there will only be 2 grades. What are their plans for that 3rd pod?? Hey - maybe they could put all the illegal immigrants in that pod. Oh wait, I'm sure that would cause criticism for segregation and 1 pod probably wouldn't be big enough to hold all of them.

VOTE NO!!
I vote NO
Aug 19, 2008 5:46 PM
After the fiasco of the middle school being built almost out of town (and a hardship for all students to get there except those who live in the newest homes of east Fremont); after the closing of North, Clarkson, etc., and the conversion of the old Jr. High buildings into the school board offices and a community college, does the School Board really think we are going to support this latest wild scheme?? Can't we find some people to run for the school board who have some common sense? Do they really believe we just want to keep paying and paying taxes forever as they close school after school and keep building new??
Fiscal Responsibility
Aug 19, 2008 5:56 PM
Fremont Public Schools needs to toe the line right now and not take on huge additional debt - it's not good for individuals and it's certainly not good for our school district/real estate taxes.
Sam
Aug 19, 2008 7:37 PM
Fremont needs to invest in education. The comments on these stories on this web site prove that time and time again.
Robert D
Aug 19, 2008 10:17 PM
For those community members worried about paying taxes to provide schools for the "illegals", the fact is you already are. The "illegals" are not leaving town and will continue to be served by the district (the district must serve all who show up). Voters need to decide if they want Fremont children to be in classes of 35 or 40 students (some of them children of illegals) or in classes of 25 students (still with children of illegals). Bottom line: The growth is going to happen whether the Fremont Public Schools have the facilities or not. Why not be ready for once?
oh please
Aug 19, 2008 10:57 PM
You nay-sayers are right. Why support a plan for the future here in Fremont. Why work to address growth and facility issues throughout the district and most importantly why do it now when we can maintain a levy and not add a new one. We'll just sit around, complain, whine, do nothing and wait 10 years until we are in emergency mode and this all costs a 100% more. Then you can all complain that we had no leadership and no plan and that's how we got ourselves into this mess.

But most importantly, why get all the facts and wait until they have had public meetings and opportunities to learn more before we pass judgements.

If feels good to have such an educated population here.
Just a thought
Aug 19, 2008 11:10 PM
Perhaps we should take all the money we spend on English as a Second Language courses and use those to help fund reparing and expanding our schools.
Joan Behrens
Aug 20, 2008 4:48 AM
I'm very confused as to why we need to update the middle school so soon after it was built?? I'm not allowing myself to think that something wasn't planned right in the beginning.. I just want answers as to why this is happening?
CK
Aug 20, 2008 7:14 AM
Well sooner or later that, bond issue will have to happen. It can happen now with no new increase to taxes or it can happen later and cost us all more later.

Whoever said it sounds like a scam... think about this. Do you really expect taxes to go down? That money is going to get spent on something else, it will likely get funneled into something else, taxes will likely stay the same. Personally I'd like to have a choice in what that money's spent on and education sounds like a good way to spend it.

Why do we need to overhaul the Middle School? Have you ever tried to get in there right before or after school? It's overcrowded. Omaha rush hour has nothing on the FMS, that's due to overcrowding, I'm surprised we haven't read a story about a kid getting hit trying to walk home from school.

Please look at this issue carefully, and separate it from the other issues they really can't be intertwined the way some of you assume. Just because you try to vote something down won't mean your ordinance will pass, in fact it might make your cause seem less appealing to those of us on the fence about that totally separate issue.
scoop
Aug 20, 2008 11:19 AM
how will putting yet another school(5th) out in the country help the traffic. The only way out there is Military.Why isn't their more busing? My son lives by the high school and they have to leave town for work early too,but unlike Western Fremont,they have to find rides for their children.If you are too far to walk,then busing should be made available.And what is Lincoln grade school being used for these days??
Supporter
Aug 20, 2008 11:53 AM
Thankfully the folks that make it to the polls in these matters tend to be those who actually educate themselves on this matter. I believe that we should support plans for the future and to complete what we started with the bond issues of the past several years.
Al
Aug 20, 2008 11:55 AM
Fremont has a problem much bigger that illegal workers...it's called uneducated "legals" -- you are a much scarier group to me. Far too many of you it seems.
scoop
Aug 20, 2008 11:57 AM
Maybe the middle school could stagger the opening classes's times?
parent
Aug 20, 2008 12:00 PM
THANK YOU to Howard PTA for your work to help with classroom materials. PTA's at all the schools have done a great job helping improve education in Fremont.
Day Acres
Aug 20, 2008 12:22 PM
I live in Day Acres and I don't understand why you people don't want another school built by the new middle school; there is plenty of land, new roads, bike trail, waterpark---what's your problem?
Scoop
Aug 20, 2008 12:42 PM
Is there any supervision on those trails ? Does the school encourage the kids to go there? Or do they suggest they leave for home right after school? Many have a pretty long ride.
b
Aug 20, 2008 1:51 PM
I do not have a problem with spending money on our school, in fact if you have to tax me more by all means let it be for the schools. I agree the older schools need the remodeling they are asking for and it should be done asap. However this mess with the Middle School is just disgraceful. If our money had been spent the way they told us in the first place the school would have been larger and ready for a growing population, instead they just had to have fancy roofline. I am afraid if we approve this latest plan they will misrepresent their ideas again and misuse our money again. How can they expect us to trust them now? I also agree putting another school out by the Middle School before addressing the traffic issues is a horrific accident waiting to happen.
interested parent
Aug 20, 2008 4:11 PM
I assume there will be public meetings and more information on this? Are any scheduled at this time?

Folks--- let's get the facts straight. Come to a meeting and ask some of these questions and then let's make an informed decision.
another thought
Aug 20, 2008 8:32 PM
Perhaps the school Board will reconsider and place the new school out by Christensen Field, then the residents of Day Acres can see how nice it is to drive all the way across town to get to and from school. This area has soccer fields, trails, etc. a great place for a new school.
greg p
Aug 20, 2008 9:07 PM
All the crying about the middle school being so far away is so last year -- not actually so four years ago. Move on, get over it already. I live midtown and am glad it is not close to my house...if somehow living close by is such a big treat then move.
howie
Aug 20, 2008 9:16 PM
seems like no matter what elected officials do in Fremont so many of you complain and throw stones.

Pretty easy to sit in your easy chair and judge...something much different to get informed and invovled and try to impact change for the good.

I want to vote for a law that says your illegal if you are lazy, negative and uniformed.
LSB
Aug 20, 2008 11:33 PM
I agree we need to invest in our children's education, but I do not believe new fancy buildings and new entryways do anything to improve education. Spend my money on text books, computers and better qualified teachers!! If our children do not have the essentials they need for a quality education it makes no difference how new and pretty the building they are "not" learning in is.

As was said before, after the lies we were told with the last bond issue how can we trust them this time around. I think we need something in writing laying out exactly what is going to happen this time around and then that plan should be followed and not altered after the fact.

After being told the old middle school buildings were beyond repair and then after our new schools are built and the old ones torn down, we sit and watch them update those buildings we were told could not be updated. This is a bit upsetting for those of us footing the bill for this. Tell me those buildings are not up to code for handicapped requirements, fine. Tell me those buildings can not be updated in a timely manner to accommodate the school year, OK. But don't feed me a line, turn around and do what you said couldn't be done and expect me to believe you the next time around.

Burn me once shame on you, burn me twice shame on me.

I have mixed feelings on this issue and will have to listen to the total plan before making a decision this time.
Other Options
Aug 21, 2008 7:43 AM
Instead of tearing down the two story portion of Linden School, why not consider just adding an elevator. It would cost less than $50,000 and the usuable capacity of having 2 floors accessible in one area is double what having the entire school one level is. Simple math.

All all for supporting education, but again, I believe it should be by hiring the best teachers and having the materials needed. It does not come with fancy buildings. With the cost of everything rising right now, it is not the time to spend money for items that aren't really necessary.
Hold the Checkbook
Aug 21, 2008 8:36 AM
FPS needs to toe the line for a few years; not take on huge additional debt at this time. Taxpayers don't need to take on additional debt right now, no matter how they dress it up and present it; it's still massive debt.
Frustrated
Aug 21, 2008 12:05 PM
I am just blown away by the people who jump to conclusions on this subject.
**First of all, not everyone will be happy with the location of a new school. If it is put on the East side then the West enders would complain, but if it was on the West side, then then east siders would complain. There is not any place in the middle that such a building can be.
**From my understanding, there were elementary buildings that were closed because they were old and not efficient to have that many facilities to stretch out specials teachers and maintain all the additional grounds.
**The old middle school is now offices. People complain because they were updated for the administration. Well folks, the structure is not sound enough to have 600 or 900 students in it any more. It would not be financially feasible to update to the extent to have students in it. The air conditioning units that were installed are only for few people.
**Come to meetings, ask questions and get informed before making any decisions or jumping to conclusions. Be proud of Fremont Public Schools and support this bond issue. It is a high quality district that really has its act together. It may not be growing at the pace of Elkhorn Schools but it is definitely growing.
scoop
Aug 21, 2008 12:15 PM
The old unusable,but somehow updateable, Junior high was centrally located with many arteries going in and out.Many kids could walk or ride bikes. Why couldn't they have bought up a little of the surrounding properties like Midland does?Just too darn easy.The taxpayers still wound up paying for updates. No sense crying over spilt moey,eer I mean milk.
CK
Aug 21, 2008 4:05 PM
The issue is space, the issue is class sizes, the issue is having music rooms, art rooms, rooms for reading recovery, rooms for ELL, all in buildings that our children feel safe and comfortable in, the best textbooks in the world aren't going to amount to much if they don't have a place to be. Some of these schools have to cram multiple teachers into what amounts to a glorified closet with any number of students (sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen). Some have to share space with the staff lounge. Some teachers are forced to put everything on a cart and wheel it from room to room. Tell me that's optimal even if your teacher was Ron Clarke!

That's the situation now.

This bond issue if it passes won't even help until the renovations are completed.

What's happening at Lincoln Elementary? It's not there, it's gone, the past is gone, live in the now. The buildings that still exist (like Clarkson) are owned by someone else or are still in use; the ones that aren't (north side, and Lincoln) were also sold and were tore down and made into (guess what...) more housing, we ARE growing.

We can wait until a bond issue is needed later and taxes will go up.

Personally I'd rather do this while they don't have to go up.

But I'm not going to vote "yes" without attending a few of these meetings, and neither should anyone else.

On the other hand you shouldn't vote "no" because you are crying over spilled milk from 5-6 years ago, that's just silly.
Pollyanna
Aug 21, 2008 6:12 PM
I sure enjoyed that ride to the middle school this morning - it gave me lots of time to plan my day!
No-Frills
Aug 22, 2008 6:54 AM
Listen, things get done by people with money and those with the money say how, when, and where those things will be done. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out why the new Middle School is located where it is.

I'm all for children being educated in safe structures. However, there is a difference between safe and aesthetically pleasing. I have no doubt that the Middle School could have provided the same safe structure with less cost had a few of the frills been cut out.
Complete Waste of Time
Aug 22, 2008 7:36 AM
Hey Pollyanna - wait for the ride home; it gets even better.

At least in the mornings, not all of the kids show up at the same time; but in the afternoon when they all get out at the same time, it is a complete chaotic mess!
Bond Will Pass
Aug 22, 2008 9:58 AM
The bond will pass, just as last time, because all you morons aren't registered to vote and won't vote when the issue comes up.
George
Aug 22, 2008 10:34 AM
When I consider all the ignorance I see on these blogs, combined with the poor grammar, I think an investment in the public schools is just what this town needs.
b
Aug 22, 2008 10:54 AM
To bond wil pass
What is with calling people names? The only person that makes look bad is yourself.
As for this noone being registered to vote or not voting business. I am registered and I do vote. I voted against the last bond and unless something changes I will most likely vote against this. I am open minded so I will leave the possiblilty of something changing my mind.